Best for: Food & beverage companies, agricultural multinationals, consumer goods manufacturers, and commodity-exposed financial institutions needing AI-native physical climate risk intelligence at 1km spatial resolution — specifically for supply chain sourcing decisions, procurement planning, agricultural yield forecasting, and TCFD/CSRD physical risk disclosure.

Best for: European mid-market companies — roughly 250 to 3,000 employees — facing several sustainability regulations at once (CSRD or VSME, EUDR, CBAM, PPWR, EcoVadis) with a small internal team that intends to own the compliance process rather than outsource it to consultants.

Best for: European SMEs and mid-market companies (10–2,000 employees) taking their first or second step in carbon accounting — particularly those responding to customer CSRD supply chain requests, EcoVadis assessments, or preparing for Wave 2 CSRD obligations with limited internal expertise.

Best for: Banks, insurers, asset managers, institutional investors, utilities and operators of physical assets in regulated sectors that need finance-grade physical climate risk quantification — asset-level to portfolio-level, across 9 perils to 2100 — that clears Model Risk Management and regulatory review (TCFD, CSRD, ISSB), plus ROI-backed adaptation planning.

Best for: Mid-market to large enterprises with complex Scope 3 inventories that need independently verified carbon data and a named climate expert included in the engagement — particularly organizations approaching their first third-party assurance or SBTi submission.

Best for: Large enterprises facing mandatory carbon disclosure under CSRD or SEC climate rules where the disclosed figure will be reviewed by an external assurance provider — and financial institutions measuring financed emissions across loan books and investment portfolios under PCAF methodology, where the calculation problem is not generic but asset-class-specific and the regulatory consequence of getting it wrong is material.

Best for: European mid-market to large enterprises at Stage 3 maturity — organizations with a CSRD obligation on the horizon, a commitment to SBTi, and a need to move from compliance baseline to active decarbonization plan within a single platform.

Best for: Medium-to-large enterprises already invested in Salesforce that want carbon accounting and ESG reporting (Scope 1, 2 and 3) managed on the same platform as their financial, supply-chain and operational data — with Einstein AI easing the reporting burden and built-in report builders for CSRD, GRI, SASB, CDP and California climate disclosure laws.

Best for: Large enterprises in energy, heavy industry, manufacturing, and financial services with board-approved net-zero targets and a pipeline of decarbonization investment decisions — where the sustainability team must present carbon reduction projects to Finance in NPV, IRR, and $/tCO2 terms from the same platform that produced the GHG inventory.

Best for: Multinational corporate groups and listed companies with 10 or more subsidiary entities that must consolidate carbon and ESG data across complex organizational structures — where the primary obstacle to CSRD compliance is not knowing how to calculate emissions, but not being able to get clean, governed, auditable data out of 25 different business units in time to produce a figure an assurance provider will not challenge.

Best for: Large enterprises and multinationals with complex global supply chains and an in-house sustainability team ready to move beyond annual reporting toward operational decarbonization decisions.